Reworked: How managers weigh employee AI use in performance reviews
Shuhua Sun, Peter W. and Paul A. Callais Professor of Entrepreneurship, was interviewed by Reworked for a story about how managers should evaluate the effective use of AI in the workplace.
Even if employees use AI to conduct much of their work, they still need to be held accountable, Sun said, "but the nature of accountability changes." Accountability shifts from "execution to judgment," Sun explained. People should be held accountable for functions, such as whether AI was an appropriate tool for the task, they evaluated its outputs critically, identified risks and intervened when a problem arose.
To read the article in its entirety, visit reworked.co:
Interested in advancing your education and/or career? Learn more about Freeman’s wide range of graduate and undergraduate programs. Find the right program for you.
Recommended Reading
- The Importance of AI Integration for Business Leaders
- How Is Data Analytics Used in Health Care?
- Supply Chain Analyst: Salary and Job Description
- How Is AI Used in Retail Analytics?
- Business Analytics vs. Finance: Which Master’s Degree Is Right for You?
- What Skills Can You Gain From a Master of Business Analytics and AI Curriculum?
- How to Become a Business Analyst
- 6 Master of Business Analytics & AI Careers
Other Related Articles
- Research Notes: Larisa Cioaca
- Seattle Times: Microsoft offers buyouts for longtime employees
- Forbes: How To Gain Influence In Meetings Through Executive Presence
- AP News: Simple ways to make meetings work better for employees on the autism spectrum
- Futurist Series highlights AI’s impact on private equity
- Business Insider: The sneaky truth about the wave of AI layoffs
- The AI Innovator: The Often Missing Skill in the AI Boom
- LA Times: Airfares set to take off as fuel prices fly